Condividi tramite

Chinese and Hebrew IE7 Released

  • Articolo

We released three additional language versions of Windows Internet Explorer 7 – Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional and Hebrew. This adds to the list of previously released language versions in Arabic, Finnish, French, German, Brazilian Portuguese, Japanese, Italian, Russian, Dutch, Korean and Spanish. Download language versions of Windows Internet Explorer 7 here. 

More language versions of Internet Explorer 7 will be available over the next few months.

Mary Hoffman
Program Manager

Comments

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    o,the size of the software is increasing bigger more bigger, can you develop occupying less system resources, but it can do more functions of the software?Be considered to contribute to the world energy savings.

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    In spanish, IE installer creates a folder called "Accessorios" in start menu for "Add-ins disabled mode" shortcut. The correct name for that folder is "Accesorios". By the ways, when will be fixed the EOLAS problems?

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    IE7 runs very slowly on my computer, especially when opening a new tab for browsing. I don't know why Opera can run so fast and Opera has almost all functions that IE7 can provide.

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    I can't find the Simplified Chinese version.

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    Chinese and Hebrew IE7 Released yes,i know!

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    This appears to be the second Phantom Launch of Simplified Chinese. I have been to where I would expect the download and it just is not there. Is this some kind of very amusing joke or does the right not know what the left is doing?

  • Anonymous
    December 01, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    Some corporations don't follow the steps of Microsft, such as China Construction Back. The online bank cannot install the certification and finish the operation on IE7. So I think it is the responsibility of Microsoft to accerlate the developing of new software compatible with IE7.

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    I downloaded ie7 this morning,I think ie7 is very good.But the new font 雅黑 of ie7 and office2007 is not accustomed.

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    IE7 is very fast on my very old PC

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    *** offtopic *** Perhaps it's a good idea to do a blog post about persistence in Internet Explorer that does not use cookies? And if there have been any changes in behavior since IE5 (which is the version of Internet Explorer that seems to be covered by most articles regarding non-cookie persistence)? I'm also curious about whether it can be disabled or not. A helpful page can be found here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/persistence/overview.asp

  • Anonymous
    December 02, 2006
    @David Wrixon I guess Japanese customers pay a lot more money than Chinese. Micrsoft might also have more history in Japan and that might also include moretranslational capacity. Chinese also probably causes extra problem as it has several version some of which are reasonably complex and that makes fast translations even less easy. It is likely that Chinese versions will always be amongst the last to be released just because of the needed work.

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    雅黑相当不错的说，被认为是简体字体中最好的，解决了很多原来字体中的不足。

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    Dear team software IE 7, Congratulation for IE 7 is very excellente navigation! Just one problem for development webpage. My problem CSS : ///Position: fixed//// no correctly show the scroll block isn't move... Why? Thank you a french boy.

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    雅黑字体并不清晰。 ClearType技术用在中文上还不成熟。

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    中文版最关注的就是字体的问题了。从清晰的角度看雅黑字体的确不是最优秀的。

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    Howcome the Swedish version is so late this time?

  • Anonymous
    December 03, 2006
    IE 7 nice navigational feautures! but still some bugs ........

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    ClearType只对英文有效。 用在中文上只能称为模糊字体。

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    @TMaster: The non-cookie persistence features haven't materially changed since IE5. The only meaningful difference is that the "Delete Browsing History" feature will now delete the UserData store.

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    I checked the new version of IE7 in hebrew - works fine!. This version also (like IE7 en) affected the bug of the 100% CPU. Testcase: http://img2.tapuz.co.il/forums/1_90212021.htm when you move (only move) the mouse fast on the messages on the forum - IE uses 100% CPU. On Quirks mode - all OK IE6 - OK FF - OK

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 04, 2006
    Thank you, Eric. I do have a few additional questions, though, if you don't mind.

  1. "userDatapersists page state and information within an XML store, a hierarchical data structure." - Where is this stored? In the UserData folder? And with which button in the "Delete Browsing History" would it be removed?
  2. How does the user control which sites can use XML stores? Or is this not enabled by default for the Internet Zone?
  3. Is there a way to prevent persistence in your Favorites or even in general? *** offtopic once more *** I'm sorry for not reporting this to the newsgroup, but I'm having an issue using tabs when combined with the Google Toolbar ActiveX: If I want to have the "Open in new tab" context menu option, I have to disable the googletoolbar3.dll "Toolbar" add-on. I'm using an up-to-date IE7 English/XP Home SP2 Dutch. Is this a known problem? I figure you'll want to tell me Google needs to fix their DLL, but I don't think it's that simple; how is it possible an add-on can remove Internet Explorer functionality?! I thought it was a plug-in, but apparently there can be a plug-out as well...

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2006
    Update to the Google Toolbar issue: I just installed a new version, and my "open in new tab" item re-appeared, however, I still stand behind what I said earlier today.

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2006
    @TMaster: IE has a very powerful plugin model that enables significant customization of the browser.  One aspect of that is the ability to customize the context menu. UserData is stored in the C:documents and settingsUSERNAMEuserdata folder.  I believe it's deleted in all of the cases where Cookies are deleted.  The ability to persist userdata is a Zone specific setting (not per-site) and you can control its availability using the Tools/Internet Options/Security/Customize list of settings.

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 05, 2006
    Where is Chinese Simplified version? I can't find it.

  • Anonymous
    December 06, 2006
    It would be nice if you guys added a right click menu item to the refresh button which would "Refresh All" open tabs.  

  • Anonymous
    December 06, 2006
    "This is extremely frustrating for designers, and pretty unnecessary since Mozilla and Safari have both apparently figured out how to avoid this." They've figured out how to decide between rounding up or down? This is something that is either standardized or it isn't. Until it isn't, no one has figured it out. Mozilla/Safari != Standard

  • Anonymous
    December 06, 2006
    "They've figured out how to decide between rounding up or down?" Well, there's always mathematical logic to argue with. 1.4 results in 1 and 1.5 in 2. Wether IE or the others is making the mistake - I don't know. Arguing with experience, I'd guess IE's making the mistake. However that's not proven yet (for me).

  • Anonymous
    December 06, 2006
    Thank you for your response, Eric. I do have to say I disagree with Internet Explorer allowing the removal of context menu items. "Open in new tab" is an option important to Internet Explorer and should not be removable - though I think allowing items to be added is a good idea (which is available already). Perhaps it's interesting to note that when the Google Toolbar managed to remove the "open in new tab" option, the context menu switched to Dutch, while it's back to English now that the option has returned (due to the Toolbar update). Also, I found out the options that were previously added by the Google Toolbar have disappeared - I guess they received some bug reports and decided to disable it entirely - not that I mind.

  • Anonymous
    December 08, 2006
    IE7 is truly slower than Ie6. That 'conneting' thing takes several seconds, which IE6 didn't. It can be enough to make it as slow as Firefox to load. Why such a bad new 'feature' in such good product? You may jeopardize the whole effort just because of that. Next fix should be focused all on that... A guy who loves IE is talking here. It's slow at loading. It's a fact. :(

  • Anonymous
    December 10, 2006
    Certainly IE a great browser, but IMHO version 6 is more friendly to user than new IE7.

  • Anonymous
    December 10, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    December 11, 2006
    Oh, i have installed IE7 on my home PC, Windows XP SP2 simplified Chinese version, unfortunately, the IE7 can NOT be started! I clicked the icon and nothing happened! I followed the KB926449, but nothing listed on that KB works. I checked the system event log but nothing found. It just totally does not work on my machine. I have to use the firefox to post this complain. Anyone can tell me how to get some error message output from ie7? or except the KB926449, i can find anything else?

  • Anonymous
    December 11, 2006
    @Alberto "IE7 is truly slower than Ie6. That 'conneting' thing takes several seconds, which IE6 didn't." IE 3 is much faster, why don't you use it?

  • Anonymous
    December 12, 2006
    OK! I found the problem! I found if the psapi.dll in the Internet Explorer directory will make my IE 7 start failed without any messages! My psapi.dll in the Internet Explorer directory is 14848 bytes, 4.0.1371.1, Process Status Helper. I guess this dll file is too old and I found the same psapi.dll in system32 directory and the version is 5.1.2600.2180. I guess this is a dll conflict but the IE 7 installer does not detect.

  • Anonymous
    December 12, 2006
    @Steve: Correct, PSAPI.dll should not exist outside of your system32 directory.  This is a common problem, and it's listed up at www.enhanceie.com/ie/troubleshoot.asp

  • Anonymous
    December 13, 2006
    Download IE 7 zh-tw but can't work platform : XPSP2 At first I used IE7 Eng release version but after I uninstall IE7 Eng . I already download the file IE7-WindowsXP-x86-cht.exe many times , and then double click this file , it start to extract the file , but then nothing happen ... So I try to use the previous IE7-WindowsXP-x86-enu.exe but it doesn't work either ..... I change the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMControlSet001ControlNlsLocale and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMControlSet001ControlNlsLanguage to 0409 and 000000409 but it doesn't work ... which means that I can't install IE 7 what is wrong ? Thank You

  • Anonymous
    December 14, 2006
    "This is something that is either standardized or it isn't. Until it isn't, no one has figured it out." That makes no sense. The bug works like this: if the window size is an odd number of pixels, then when the browser calculates the sizes for each side of a margin: auto; block it's rounding up both numbers, which results in a size that is bigger than the window. In that instance, one side should be bigger than the other by 1 pixel. Again, it's been solved in both Firefox and Safari. Surely those bright geniuses at MSFT can puzzle it out. I find it hard to believe that you think calculating a size that is NOT the same as the window size could be considered correct behavior.

  • Anonymous
    December 15, 2006
    The comment has been removed